Catalog Search Results
Author
Description
In 1849, Macaulay published the first two volumes of "The History of England, From the Accession of James II," which were immediately well-received. As a Whig, with little tolerance for Tories or understanding of James II, Macaulay disregarded many authoritative texts in his research; as a result, his work is often prejudiced and mistaken in the facts, with little room for philosophy or theorizing. However, it cannot be denied that this work is a...
Author
Description
In 1849, Macaulay published the first two volumes of "The History of England, From the Accession of James II," which were immediately well-received. As a Whig, with little tolerance for Tories or understanding of James II, Macaulay disregarded many authoritative texts in his research; as a result, his work is often prejudiced and mistaken in the facts, with little room for philosophy or theorizing. However, it cannot be denied that this work is a...
Author
Description
In 1849, Macaulay published the first two volumes of "The History of England, From the Accession of James II," which were immediately well-received. As a Whig, with little tolerance for Tories or understanding of James II, Macaulay disregarded many authoritative texts in his research; as a result, his work is often prejudiced and mistaken in the facts, with little room for philosophy or theorizing. However, it cannot be denied that this work is a...
Author
Description
In 1849, Macaulay published the first two volumes of "The History of England, From the Accession of James II," which were immediately well-received. As a Whig, with little tolerance for Tories or understanding of James II, Macaulay disregarded many authoritative texts in his research; as a result, his work is often prejudiced and mistaken in the facts, with little room for philosophy or theorizing. However, it cannot be denied that this work is a...
Author
Description
In 1849, Macaulay published the first two volumes of "The History of England, From the Accession of James II," which were immediately well-received. As a Whig, with little tolerance for Tories or understanding of James II, Macaulay disregarded many authoritative texts in his research; as a result, his work is often prejudiced and mistaken in the facts, with little room for philosophy or theorizing. However, it cannot be denied that this work is a...
Didn't find it?
Can't find what you are looking for? Try our Materials Request Service. Submit Request